10/16 USCIS EB-5 Stakeholder Meeting

Unfortunately I was not able to be in Washington DC for today’s EB-5 Stakeholder Engagement with USCIS, but I did listen in by teleconference and have uploaded my recording of the call. The most significant update is that “next month” promises another “Conversation with the Director” including Director Mayorkas and Rob Silvers that will tell us what we really want to know: what’s happening with “tenant occupancy” and the EB-5 policy memo.  Today’s engagement deferred those topics, but did provide substantive comment on a number of issues. We heard a detailed description of the work flow process and staffing in the EB-5 adjudicative team and confirmation of the rumor that USCIS is working with the SEC to investigate some regional center activities. The panelists responded to questions regarding NAICS codes, construction timeline and job counts, job preservation for a troubled business, timeline for sustaining investment, conditions for use of bridge loans, and investment return in the form of real estate, among other issues. Ears pricked up when the panelists revealed some reasons that I-526 may be put on “operational hold” (e.g. all I-526 for one project on hold while the first is adjudicated, and I-526 for a Regional Center on hold while an amendment is adjudicated for that RC). I learned several things, though I’m never sure what I can take to the bank from a stakeholder meeting. Will the adjudicator who gets my I-526 with a new economic methodology be impressed when I play my recording of Blake Gotto at the 10/16 meeting saying that nothing precludes me from doing this instead of filing an amendment? Can I count on Kevin’s statement that a troubled business does not need to save the same positions that were in place prior to investment, so long as the head count remains the same, including FT/PT positions? I’ll have to listen again to the recording and re-read Matter of Hsiung. This meeting did not include a presentation, but I look forward to the eventual executive summary. I see that EB-5 Center has posted some notes on the meeting, and I will link here to other comment as it emerges. I’m also eager to hear reports from the IIUSA conference this weekend, which I am sorry to have missed as well.

About Suzanne (www.lucidtext.com)
Lucid Professional Writing provides writing and editing services for businesses and scholars, and specializes in assisting clients to prepare business plans for filing with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

8 Responses to 10/16 USCIS EB-5 Stakeholder Meeting

  1. David says:

    As usual Suzanne thank you very much for the update.

  2. David Eckert says:

    Suzanne,

    Do we have any specific guidance on projects that offer real estate as the exit or payback to the EB-5 investor?

    David
    Empire State RC

  3. Thanks for the update Suzanne. I’m attaching a link to my blog where I discuss what I think was a new stealth bomb thrown at us at last week’s meeting: http://juliaparklaweb5.blogspot.com/2012/10/something-new-1016-quarterly-meeting.html

  4. Pingback: www.nationofimmigrators.com

  5. Pingback: Immigration's NannyStateGate: Picking EB-5 Winners and Losers : Nation of Immigrators : California Immigration Lawyer : Attorney Angelo A. Paparelli

  6. Pingback: Promises for the future, not today « EB-5 Updates

  7. Pingback: Immigration's NannyStateGate: Picking EB-5 Winners and Losers | Nation Of Immigrators

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 340 other followers

%d bloggers like this: