EB-5 Visa Availability in FY2021
September 24, 2020 17 Comments
October 2020 begins the government’s new fiscal year, which means a new set of annual visas available.
The October 2020 Visa Bulletin announces that that the annual limit for Employment-Based (EB) visas – normally 140,000 – will be approximately 261,500 for FY2021.
The quota for EB-5 (employment-based fifth preference) is 7.1% of total EB visas by law. So the EB-5 quota — which is approximately 140,000*0.071=9,940 in a normal year – will be approximately 261,500*0.071=18,567 for FY2021.
The country cap also shares visas on a percent basis – 7.0% to each country. So each country limited by the country cap can expect at least 18,567*0.07=1,300 EB-5 visas available in FY2021. China, the country with oldest EB-5 applicants, will theoretically get what’s left of 18,567 after deducting 2,600 visas for India plus Vietnam and however many rest-of-the world applicants can get I-526 approval and visa processing in time to claim visas (historically, under 4,000 visas).
What does this mean?
First, note that the extra employment-based visas available in FY2021 represent family-based visas that went unused in FY2020. 261,500 – 140,000 = 121,500, so we now know that 121,500 FB visas available in FY2020 were not issued, thanks to the combined effect of anti-immigration executive orders and consular closures. FB’s loss is EB’s gain. (I previously wrote a guest article explaining how the visa allocation process works, and anticipating the extra visas.)
[10/1/2020 UPDATE: Note that the updated version of the Heroes Act (coronavirus relief bill) passed in the House on 10/1 includes language in Division T Title I (PDF p. 2023-2024) that would change the allocation of unused visas for FY2021 and FY2022, returning family-based visas to the family-based category. This Democrat-centric bill currently has no chance to progress further. But if the language in the House bill did become law, then EB-5 would go back to expecting no more than 9,940 visas available in FY2021 and FY2022, instead of benefiting from unused family-based visas.]
What extra FY2021 visa availability means in practice for EB-5 will depend on whether and where available visas can be issued. Keep in mind these three constraints on the visa process:
- The number of visas available to EB-5. (This year will have almost twice as many as usual)
- How many visas the consulates can issue. (Still unknown when consulates will resume normal operations. A number of consulates – for example in nearly-virus-free Vietnam – have never had much pandemic excuse to close, and yet still at minimal operations, judging by monthly reports. The consular processing forecast going forward appears to depend on political as well as pandemic trends.)
- How many visas can be issued through adjustment of status. (This depends on how many EB-5 investors are in the U.S., how efficiently IPO can approve I-526 for those investors, and how efficiently USCIS can process I-485.)
The overall best case scenario is that consulates and USCIS will both go back to doing their jobs, and over 18,500 EB-5 visas will actually get issued in FY2021, equably to the oldest applicants both abroad in the U.S. That could shave almost one year off the expected visa wait times for Vietnamese and Indian investors, and deduct several years from the expected China wait time. (This benefit will be countered by however many expected FY2020 visas were lost due to consulate closures: we don’t know this number yet.)
Alternatively, if consular processing remains stuck while USCIS works efficiently in FY2021, then the few Vietnamese, Indian, and even Chinese EB-5 applicants able to use I-485 in the U.S. may skip their entire expected visa waits and get visas this year. Meanwhile, their compatriots abroad would face future wait times lengthened by the number of visas issued out-of-chronological order in the U.S. (and concurrently shortened by the number of visas issued above the average quota, if any).
Alternatively, if consular processing remains stuck and also USCIS continues operating at low volume, both for I-526 and I-485, then FY2021 may end with many of the technically-available EB-5 visas not having been issued to anyone. In that case, the unused EB-5 visas would be lost to EB-1 (as happened to any available EB-5 visas not issued in FY2020). In that case, EB-5 wait times (calculated based on the expectation of about 10,000 visas issued annually) would be lengthened across the board according to how far FY2020 and FY2021 fell below the expected average visas issued.
The Visa Bulletin is Department of State’s lever to channel visa demand. DOS knows more than we do about plans for consular operations, USCIS operations, and the number of people with pending I-526, pending I-485, and pending visa applications. So I try to read between the lines of the visa bulletin to understand what they know about constraints going forward.
Quoted from the October 2020 Visa Bulletin
E. MOVEMENT OF THE OCTOBER FINAL ACTION AND APPLICATION FILING DATES
Employment-based: All of the Final Action and Application Filing Dates have been advanced at a very rapid pace, in anticipation of the FY 2021 annual limit being approximately 261,500, an all-time high. The movement of these dates has been taken in consultation with USCIS Office of Policy and Strategy to accommodate processing plans for USCIS Offices during the coming fiscal year and to maximize number use within the FY 2021 annual limits. Pending demand, in the form of applications for adjustment of status, and documentarily qualified immigrant visa applicants, is well below the estimated annual limit of 261,500. Adjustment of status applications filed early in FY 2021 are most likely to be adjudicated during the upcoming fiscal year. [UPDATE: at about noon on 9/24, this last sentence was deleted from the visa bulletin.]
F. VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE COMING MONTHS
EMPLOYMENT-based categories (potential monthly movement)
Employment Fifth: The category will remain “Current” for most countries
China: No forward movement
Vietnam: Limited forward movementThe above final action date projections for the Family and Employment categories indicate what is likely to happen on a monthly basis through January. The determination of the actual monthly final action dates is subject to fluctuations in applicant demand and a number of other variables.
“All of the Final Action and Application Filing Dates have been advanced at a very rapid pace” in anticipation of a record-high visa limit, says the Visa Bulletin Section E. Only that statement is not true for the EB-5 category. The October 2020 Visa Bulletin has exactly the same Final Action and Application Filing dates for EB-5 as the September 2020 visa bulletin (except for the note about visa unavailability in case the regional center program is not reauthorized). The visa bulletin further predicts little to no forward movement for the China and Vietnam EB-5 dates at least through January.
With so many more visas available to EB-5, why isn’t the visa bulletin moving EB-5 dates? One factor is this statement in Visa Bulletin Section E: “The movement of these dates has been taken in consultation with USCIS Office of Policy and Strategy to accommodate processing plans for USCIS Offices during the coming fiscal year and to maximize number use within the FY 2021 annual limits.” Normally, visa bulletin date movement is just to maximize number use within numerical limits. It’s interesting that the visa bulletin admits a (presumably conflicting) second factor: “to accommodate processing plans for USCIS Offices.” DOS realizes that EB-5 visa issuance will be constrained by how efficient USCIS is planning to be this year. (Also, intriguing that the visa bulletin does not mention consultation with consulates about their also-relevant processing plans.)
Another factor in future visa bulletin movement: past visa bulletin movement. DOS already advanced the EB-5 Final Action and Application Filing dates very significantly in FY2020 to try to maximize visa usage under the consular processing constraint. The dates jumped in 2020 to August 2015 for China and August 2017 for Vietnam, which released a significant amount of visa demand. But then consulates all-but-stopped issuing visas, so that demand released by past visa movement is probably largely still waiting now for final action. Assuming consulates get back on track in FY2021, they may have enough EB-5 demand already to keep them busy for awhile due to constraints in 2020. Also, the fact that USCIS will now allow I-485 to be filed based on Chart B in October 2020 (while it had used Chart A since April 2020) opens up some additional visa demand for the new year. The EB-5 visa bulletin dates will only have to really jump forward for EB-5 if consular processing remains blocked indefinitely by the pandemic/politics, and the visa bulletin effectively just becomes a lever for adjustment of status demand.
This sentence from the visa bulletin Section E is also significant: “Adjustment of status applications filed early in FY 2021 are most likely to be adjudicated during the upcoming fiscal year.” [UPDATE: And even more significant: the visa bulletin was revised about seven hours after posting to delete this sentence.] The sentence suggests that DOS anticipates a good year of EB-5 visa availability for adjustment of status. Besides the increased visa quota, this could reflect predictions about limited visa demand from consular processing and/or limited volume of AOS applicants possible in light of I-526 circumstances. [The fact that the sentence was subsequently deleted suggests that USCIS called DOS to complain about representations regarding likely adjudication performance.]
For investors born in Mainland China (and people advising Chinese investors and planning redeployment), I do have a new visa timing analysis ready for China. It’s customized by quarter based on I-526 receipt data, and models scenarios around the I-526-to-visa ratio and potential range of future visa availability for China. But it’s complicated, with the number of variables involved. I’m thinking I’d better do something like a webinar or individual Zoom calls to talk through the data and scenarios, rather than just send a heavy Excel file with a book of comments. Please email me at suzanne@lucidtext.com if you are interested in my timing analysis service for China and have suggestions about the delivery and payment method that would work for you.
Investors born in Hong Kong, I still do not have news. But I notice that the October 2020 Visa Bulletin still just has the column title “CHINA-mainland born” in Chart A and Chart B, and mentions no limits for Hong Kong. So it seems to be business as usual, so far. The DOS U.S. Visa News page and the Hong Kong Consulate Immigrant Visa page have yet to interpret the Hong Kong executive order.
The employment-based visa backlog and wait times continue to be an issue of common concern, thanks to on-going lobbying around the Fairness for High-skilled Immigrants Act. I’ve written about this several times over the years, but will discuss the country caps again as time permits.
And a reminder of my PayPal link, which gives opportunity to support the effort behind this blog. As the EB-5 industry changes, your contribution will help preserve this space for in-depth, unbiased, ad-free, and freely-available EB-5 reporting.
Hi Suzanne,
Thank you for the analysis!
Do you expect AOS(chart B) move forward for China in FY 2021? Or it will still have no movement although consular remain closed? I’m afraid that this FY year may not such a good year for China EB5 as we anticipated.
I am pretty disappointed by this month’s visa bulletin, and I am thinking that since there’s such a rapid movement in other EB’s, the USCIS must be too busy to deal with EB5:) why not just keeping it stay at no movement.
I’ll guess that the China date hasn’t moved yet because DOS expects that consular processing may activate soon. If in fact consular processing stays closed and yet the visa bulletin date still does not move to accommodate more status adjustment visas for China, then we’ll know that decisions are not being made with the goal of maximizing visa issuance.
Hi,
I’m an investor for from India while filed i 526 in October 2019. Do you have any estimates on when I can expect the approval!
Thanks!
This page describes a detailed consultation, if you’re interested: https://blog.lucidtext.com/eb-5-timing/eb-5-timing-estimates/
The wired thing is they modified the visa bulletin and delete the sentence – “Adjustment of status applications filed early in FY 2021 are most likely to be adjudicated during the upcoming fiscal year.”
oh, interesting
Hi Suzanne – do we know why the sudden increase in number of Visas for 2021?
Employment-based visas available for FY2021 increased by the number of family-based visas unused in 2020. This article explains how that works: https://www.lcrcapital.com/blog/eb5-visa-increase-fy-2021/
Hello Suzanne,
Is there online data available on USCIS site about the number of EB-5 visas approved for 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020?
This information is on the Department of State website: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-statistics/annual-reports.html Because the reports are not easy to read, you might also look at the summary posts I put on this blog (linked from my data room https://blog.lucidtext.com/eb-5-timing/timing-data-room/)
I filed i-526 based AOS i-485 in October 2019 and yet received approval up until now. There was a significant delay in adjudicate eventhough my priority date turned current couple months ago
Yes, I have also heard about I-485 delays. A good point to keep in mind when moderating visa timing expectations. I hope that USCIS will be functioning more effectively soon.
Hi Suzanne,
Thank for you so much for the amazing work you’ve done! With the USCIS reopening chart B in October, would it be wise for a Chinese investor like me with a PD in December 2015 to switch to adjustment of status or to continue with the consular service as previously planned. Thank you!
This is a question to discuss with your lawyer, but I’d think adjustment of status would be the way to go, if you can. A pending I-485 has more benefits than a pending visa application, and there’s always a possibility of sooner final action if consular processing remains impeded.
Correct me if I’m wrong, It’s not related directly to your wonderful analysis work but regarding the investments through Regional Centers,
I can assume that these centers will be happy to have the visa not granted fast to keep the money more time with them. Moreover, they will be happier to do it with countries such as China and Vietnam as these countries will assure them that the time to keep the money is more.
USCIS is encouraging them to do so, after getting the conditional green card, it will need another 2 years to keep the money with the regional center in order to apply for I-829. USCIS doesn’t count that the money was with the center for 5 – 10 years before
what do you think?
From a distance, one naturally suspects conflicting motives in regional centers that control many hundreds of millions in EB-5 investment, as the self-interest in long wait times must be overwhelming. But in my personal experience with my particular regional center clients, long (and especially, unexpectedly-long) EB-5 investor wait times are a headache for them. A small regional center that channeled $50M to complete a few project capital stacks would rather not find themselves with the lives of 100 immigrant families depending on their on-going business activities for another 5-10 years, or to be on the hook for another 5-10 years of expensive compliance reporting and hassles dealing with USCIS. It’s diminishing returns, for them. I believe the majority of regional centers support visa relief.
I got your point and it makes sense. . But I would like to note that this is the task of Reginal Centers (small or big centers). The pressure from USCIS will always be on them as far as they are in this business.
They need money for their projects. They are always looking for new investors. The option to keep the money they have will be easier than looking for new investors. I Think