Diversified Investment OK? (update)


NOTE: Please see my more recent post on this topic: https://blog.lucidtext.com/2011/10/28/diversified-investmentmutual-funds/


I wonder about the diversification question in the 6/30 USCIS Quarterly EB-5 Stakeholder’s Meeting Q&A:

Question: Can an EB-5 Investor in a Regional Center divide his money into 2 or more businesses so long as each business satisfies EB-5 requirements? Can he do this in EB-5 Direct?
Response: Yes, according to 204.6(e): Commercial enterprise means any for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of lawful business including, but not limited to, a sole proprietorship, partnership (whether limited or general), holding company, joint venture, corporation, business trust, or other entity which may be publicly or privately owned. This definition includes a commercial enterprise consisting of a holding company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, provided that each such subsidiary is engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business. This definition shall not include a noncommercial activity such as owning and operating a personal residence.

If by “2 or more businesses” the questioner means “2 or more separate businesses” I believe the answer should in fact be “no,” or “it depends.” The 2003 Yates Memorandum on the 2002 DOJ Appropriations Act says: “With respect to cases where the alien entrepreneur filed a Form I-526 petition after August 31, 1998, the new law does not permit such an alien entrepreneur to meet the requirements for the removal of conditions by combining investments in multiple commercial enterprises. The investment of capital in only one commercial enterprise remains a requirement for these cases.” USCIS further elaborates in Question 11.b of the 6/30 Q&A that by “diversification” in the direct EB-5 context it only means dividing investment “within” the new commercial enterprise (ie among a holding company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries), which is consistent with the law and probably isn’t what the questioner had in mind.

According to my understanding, the answer on diversification involving unrelated job-creating entities is “no” for stand-alone EB-5 (based on Public Law 107-273 as quoted above) and “it depends” in the Regional Center context. In Regional Centers, “commercial enterprise” and “capital investment project” can be separate (ie see the 6/16/2010 Stakeholder meeting summary), opening the possibility that an investor could invest in one commercial enterprise (satisfying Public Law 107-273) which could then go on to invest in multiple capital investment projects. According to the 3/17/2011 EB-5 stakeholder’s meeting, multiple capital investment projects are okay so long as they are spelled out in advance: “A regional center may opt to structure EB-5 capital investment projects that involve multiple investment vehicles. However, USCIS has consistently maintained that a regional center must transparently show at the Form I-526 stage the specific job creating entities/projects in which the investor’s capital will be invested, supported by comprehensive business plans and an economic analysis that provides a reasonable methodology for estimating the job creation that will occur as a result of these complex investments. I-526 petitions may not be approved for investments (or loans) to businesses that will not be identified or selected until after the approval of the petition. Such a strategy is not EB-5 compliant as the EB-5 program is not an attestation-based program. Prospective job creation must be demonstrated at the Form I-526 petition through USCIS review and approval of the business plan and associated economic analysis for the actual capital investment projects that will receive the immigrant investor’s capital. This documentation provides the foundation for the adjudication of the I-829 petition to determine if the investor has met the requirements for removal of conditions pursuant to INA 216A and 8 CFR 216.6. The Ninth Circuit has held that USCIS may not “de-couple” I-526 petition approval from I-829 approval. See Chang v. U.S., 327 F.3d 911, 927 (9th Cir. 2003). This means that, using Form I-829, alien investors must demonstrate compliance with the EB-5 program rules by confirming the fulfillment of the investment scheme and business plan that USCIS approved at the I-526 petition stage. See id.”

About Suzanne (www.lucidtext.com)
Suzanne Lazicki is a business plan writer, EB-5 expert, and founder of Lucid Professional Writing. Contact me at suzanne@lucidtext.com (626) 660-4030.

4 Responses to Diversified Investment OK? (update)

  1. Yong Jin says:

    What Yates Memo says and what they said are two different things. What Yates Memo says is that investments cannot be split into TWO new commercial enterprise, what USCIS is saying is that one holding company with two subsidiaries, each carrying on different business and receiving a portion of the investment money is considered to be ONE new commercial enterprise. More specifically, you cannot have TWO holding companies with subsidiaries and each holding company receiving money.

    • Your interpretation of USCIS’s answer makes sense to me. However in that case the USCIS answer doesn’t address the initial question, which I’m pretty sure intended to ask about two+ new commercial enterprises.

  2. Yong Jin says:

    The question itself was vague, so no wonder USCIS’ answer is vague. The question should have been more specific.

  3. Pingback: Mutual fund investment structure OK? « EB-5 Updates

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.